Property Rights in Investment Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity [electronic resource] /edited by Erica Johansson.
by Johansson, Erica [editor.]; SpringerLink (Online service).
Material type:
Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
K7073-7078 (Browse shelf) | Available | ||||
Long Loan | MAIN LIBRARY | K7000-7720.22 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Browsing MAIN LIBRARY Shelves Close shelf browser
QA75.5-76.95 Visual Information Systems. Web-Based Visual Information Search and Management | RC321-580 Neurobiology of “Umwelt” | QA75.5-76.95 Focused Access to XML Documents | K7000-7720.22 Property Rights in Investment Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity | GB1001-1199.8 Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes | QC176-176.9 Geometrical Charged-Particle Optics | TA401-492 High-Temperature Measurements of Materials |
The New Order -- Developments of the Securities Markets -- The Use of Collateral in the Securities Markets -- Property Rights in Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity under English Law -- Property Rights in Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity under Swedish Law -- Property Rights in Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity under US Law -- Securities as Property -- Property Rights in Securities and the Doctrine of Specificity: A Comparative Analysis with an Outlook De Lege Ferenda.
The swift developments within the financial markets over the last 20-30 years conflict with traditional property law structures and have caused a great degree of legal uncertainty. This book evaluates the requirement for specificity as a criterion for property rights in securities evidenced by electronic entries made on securities accounts. Three principal questions are examined: i) reuse of financial collateral and the problems arising from the collateral-taker’s right to reuse the collateral; ii) characterisation of repos; and iii) the question of property rights in securities that are unallocated in relation to their entitlement holders. The analysis is made from the perspective of specificity and the requirement that the object of a property right must be identified. English, US and Swedish law are compared with the aim of finding viable solutions to the identified problems.
There are no comments for this item.