Normal view MARC view ISBD view

The Relationship between Organizational Structure and Organizational Ambidexterity [electronic resource] :A Comparison between Manufacturing and Service Firms / by Sebastian Kortmann.

by Kortmann, Sebastian [author.]; SpringerLink (Online service).
Material type: materialTypeLabelBookSeries: Betriebswirtschaftliche Studien in forschungsintensiven Industrien: Publisher: Wiesbaden : Gabler Verlag, 2012.Description: XV, 167 p. online resource.ISBN: 9783834936301.Subject(s): Economics | Economics/Management Science | Business Strategy/LeadershipDDC classification: 658.4092 Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
Organizational Structure -- Organizational Ambidexterity -- Dynamic Capabilities -- Contingency Theory -- Manufacturing vs. Service Firms.
In: Springer eBooksSummary: Sustainable competitive advantage is dependent on a firm’s ability to simultaneously balance different activities in a trade-off situation. This capability is referred to as organizational ambidexterity and may comprise various paradoxical activities, such as exploration and exploitation. To enhance the current understanding of organizational ambidexterity and how it can be realized, Sebastian Kortmann provides at least three important contributions. Apart from the development of a theoretical framework for ambidexterity, the study uncovers which structural mechanisms support ambidextrous behavior and the extent to which these relationships are dependent on firm type.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Add tag(s)
Log in to add tags.
    average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Organizational Structure -- Organizational Ambidexterity -- Dynamic Capabilities -- Contingency Theory -- Manufacturing vs. Service Firms.

Sustainable competitive advantage is dependent on a firm’s ability to simultaneously balance different activities in a trade-off situation. This capability is referred to as organizational ambidexterity and may comprise various paradoxical activities, such as exploration and exploitation. To enhance the current understanding of organizational ambidexterity and how it can be realized, Sebastian Kortmann provides at least three important contributions. Apart from the development of a theoretical framework for ambidexterity, the study uncovers which structural mechanisms support ambidextrous behavior and the extent to which these relationships are dependent on firm type.

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.
@ Jomo Kenyatta University Of Agriculture and Technology Library

Powered by Koha