The Paleoanthropology and Archaeology of Big-Game Hunting [electronic resource] :Protein, Fat, or Politics? / by John D. Speth.
by Speth, John D [author.]; SpringerLink (Online service).
Material type:
Item type | Current location | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAIN LIBRARY | CC1-960 (Browse shelf) | Available |
Browsing MAIN LIBRARY Shelves Close shelf browser
R-RZ BCL-2 Protein Family | QP351-495 Loudness | RC346-429.2 The Neurologic Diagnosis | CC1-960 The Paleoanthropology and Archaeology of Big-Game Hunting | RC254-282 Evolution of Radiation Oncology at Massachusetts General Hospital | QB495-500.269 Land Remote Sensing and Global Environmental Change | RC261-271 Environmental Factors, Genes, and the Development of Human Cancers |
How Do We Reconstruct Hunting Patterns in the Past? -- Big-Game Hunting in Human Evolution: The Traditional View -- The Other Side of Protein -- Were Big-Game Hunters Targeting Fat? -- Protein and Pregnancy -- Other Problems with High-Protein Intakes -- Protein and Taste -- Protein and Breast Milk -- Fat in Infancy -- DHA and the Developing Brain -- Big-Game Hunting: Protein, Fat, or Politics?.
Since its inception, paleoanthropology has been closely wedded to the idea that big-game hunting by our hominin ancestors arose, first and foremost, as a means for acquiring energy and vital nutrients. This assumption has rarely been questioned, and seems intuitively obvious—meat is a nutrient-rich food with the ideal array of amino acids, and big animals provide meat in large, convenient packages. Through new research, the author of this volume provides a strong argument that the primary goals of big-game hunting were actually social and political—increasing hunter’s prestige and standing—and that the nutritional component was just an added bonus. Through a comprehensive, interdisciplinary research approach, the author examines the historical and current perceptions of protein as an important nutrient source, the biological impact of a high-protein diet and the evidence of this in the archaeological record, and provides a compelling reexamination of this long-held conclusion. This volume will be of interest to researchers in Archaeology, Evolutionary Biology, and Paleoanthropology, particularly those studying diet and nutrition.
There are no comments for this item.